<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Pilgrim - Latest Comments in Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet marketing news and views</description><atom:link href="https://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/social_networks_going_the_way_of_reality_tv/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:55:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/social-networks-going-the-way-of-reality-tv.html#comment-9416145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Sam: generally speaking we're early adopters and so we're likely more "socially exhausted" than others. The rest of the public will come along and by then I'm sure there will be 1) a financially-driven consolidation amongst venues and 2) an ubiquity to many social enablement tools that deflates the hype and makes them basic "table stakes" for sites to incorporate. Just one example: the Diggesque ranking features popping up everywhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And as Sam mentioned, by then we'll be on to the Next Big Thing. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Weaver</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:55:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/social-networks-going-the-way-of-reality-tv.html#comment-9416144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great topic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it may be a game of "widgetry".  The more applications available on the network, the more interaction with the member.   When a member has 5 scrabble games on the go, over 5 photo albums posted and their "inner circle" of friends readily available, it becomes harder to shake loyalty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another factor will be platforms.  As mobility becomes increasingly important, the best interfaces for socializing on the fly will most likely do well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A lot of the second tier players are out mainly as acquisition players.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SoniaC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:20:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/social-networks-going-the-way-of-reality-tv.html#comment-9416143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I kinda get the feeling that this sort of thing is getting out of control.. but who am i to say.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;its all fun I guess - watching this all evolve.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cottage</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:41:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/social-networks-going-the-way-of-reality-tv.html#comment-9416142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If they make one just for me... I'll join it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hawaii SEO</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:44:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/social-networks-going-the-way-of-reality-tv.html#comment-9416141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not reality tv. Say it ain't so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When people see sites like Digg and MySpace succeed it's natural and inevitable that we end up seeing many copycat sites. I agree with SEO Refugee. It's not necessarily a bad thing as the networks become more niche and focused.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I think is important for most of us is to realize we don't need to participate in every one. As a user join the ones you actually enjoy spending time on. As a marketer spend time getting to know the ones that make sense for your business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You don't need to visit every site on the web and you don't need to interact with every social site out there. Pick and choose the ones that make sense for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Bradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:30:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/social-networks-going-the-way-of-reality-tv.html#comment-9416140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure all of us at the forefront are getting pretty tired of having to take a look at every new social network tool that pops up.  I know I am.  On the other hand, the majority of people still don't use social networking software of any kind.  Before most people will adopt some kind of new technology, they have to feel like it will be worth it, so people like us go through all the trouble of figuring out which ones are 'the best.'  Some of the original social networks may someday (blessedly, please, please?) die, or at least drift into the background, but newer SN's will draw together the best tools and make something that is both useful and customizable, with just the right amount of out-of-the-box features that scaredy-cats will get plenty out of it and innovators can still have fun tweaking it.  Like Facebook, maybe.  Or maybe some as yet unknown or unseen SN.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And then of course, something else will come along.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/social-networks-going-the-way-of-reality-tv.html#comment-9416139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post title...really sucked me in!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Drew Stauffer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/social-networks-going-the-way-of-reality-tv.html#comment-9416138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know that the Reality TV comparison really holds up. I definitely agree we're being constantly bombarded with new social networks each day, that's obvious. However, I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing. The more powerful niche networks we have, the better we as marketers will be able to leverage and or target those niches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For example, while a lot of design items do well on digg, dzone offers even the geekiest design article or item a chance at some decent traffic. Sure it's no digg effect but it's much more targeted. If we as SEOs/SEMs have niche networks that fit our latest topic or article or whatever, that makes our lives a lot easier, IMO.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Refugee Blog</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:49:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/social-networks-going-the-way-of-reality-tv.html#comment-9416137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It truly is inevitable, the more the internet is involved in our daily lives the more society will become lazier. Social networks facilitate laziness like no other. IMO it will only get worse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your right though an individual can only manage but so many accounts. At some point it becomes information overload.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Chappell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:37:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>