<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Pilgrim - Latest Comments in Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet marketing news and views</description><atom:link href="https://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/partial_feeds_don8217t_draw_visitors/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 10:58:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414037</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I see a partial feed, I only click through to the full feed if it is someone I really want to read, or the article is so interesting I just can't help myself, or if I want to read the comments. I do not automatically click through on every feed. That just wastes my time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dana Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 10:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also don't like partial feed. I don't like the suspence in finding out what it's all about. It's better if I know what it's all about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:09:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know &lt;a href="http://quickonlinetips.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://quickonlinetips.com"&gt;http://quickonlinetips.com&lt;/a&gt; managed 10000 feed subscribers with partial feeds only! They recently switched to full feeds too. I guess it is how readers like your content. &lt;a href="http://seroundtable.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://seroundtable.com"&gt;http://seroundtable.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://shoemoney.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://shoemoney.com"&gt;http://shoemoney.com&lt;/a&gt; also have lots of readers with partial feeds only.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Raju</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:44:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Dario - that works well for some. I hear that SEObook has success with just posting a summary of the post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beal</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:39:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What if the writer partializes the feed at a critical must-keep-on-reading point? That's what I try to do, anyway...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dario</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:10:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just use livebookmarks in Firefox for my feed tracking. If I see an interesting headline I'm likely to click right through to the blog in question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, I don't use a "feed reeder" application.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The biggest problem feeds have is that they are competing with other for a slice of your reader's attention. I scan through so many posts a day that partial feeds just don't work for me. I prefer to drop it and more on to something I can absorb more quickly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having a partial feed is the quickest way to get me to ubsubscribe to someone's feed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Owen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:12:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. It will do you no good. Some readers don't like the idea of giving them small details. Most of us want to know main idea right away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ellen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whenever I subscribe to a feed and find out that it only offers partial feeds I just unsubscribe most of the time. On the rare occasion that I do stay subscribed, I read far less of the content than I would if they had a full feed, since I am reluctant to click through. If you really want people to click through you should offer content that encourages discussion so that readers will click through to read responses and write their own comment as I just have.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Sandberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:05:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I though this was more of the three stooges than the three amigos :D&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;j/k&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Luebke</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh yes. Does that make you El Guapo?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jordan McCollum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:29:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL - Jordan would you say we had a "plethora" of authors?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beal</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:22:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414025</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'Infamous,' eh?  Cue scene from The Three Amigos.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jordan McCollum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Evan - more than just a guest, it's the infamous Jordan. I'll have to see how to change the email listing for her posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beal</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:13:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Full feeds FTW.  I clicked through b/c the MP full feed has "by andy.beal@gmail (Andy Beal)" as the author and I thought Andy went third person on us, but alas a guest author.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:47:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, of course.  Everyone says you can just police it and send DMCA letters, but really, if someone's stealing your content, they're not going to stop just because you threaten them with legal actionâ€”if you can even track them down.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jordan McCollum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:45:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/partial-feeds-dont-draw-visitors.html#comment-9414021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The main downside with full feeds is spammers stealing your content, but I think the positives far outweigh this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beal</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>