<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Pilgrim - Latest Comments in Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet marketing news and views</description><atom:link href="https://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_to_doj_why_you_should_approve_yahoo_deal/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:05:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking at it from Google's point of view, I think it actually makes sense. Beautifully put.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Eva White's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.evawhite.com/2008/06/17/canada%e2%80%99s-apology-to-the-indian-people/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.evawhite.com/2008/06/17/canada%e2%80%99s-apology-to-the-indian-people/"&gt;Canada’s Apology To The Indian People&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eva White</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:05:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Top Rated, I never thought it that way, brilliant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Goran Web Design</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:50:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope that this deal does not get through.&lt;br&gt;People are afraid of the market-share in the search-market, when they should be afraid of the market-share in the advertising market. Thats where the money and the power is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Warenwirtschaft</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:18:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Top Rated, you just said it best...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=690" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=690"&gt;Encouraging Number from IRCE 2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's hoping they just say no.  Message to Google: Go back to innovating instead of "acquiring", it's what you do best.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Top Rated's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://foolishmumbles.com/2008/06/04/the-very-best-digital-slr-cameras/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://foolishmumbles.com/2008/06/04/the-very-best-digital-slr-cameras/"&gt;The Very Best Digital SLR Cameras&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Top Rated</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think one of the DOJ's biggest concern is that, although the deal wouldn't prevent Yahoo! from making similar deals with other companies, they wouldn't have much of an incentive to do so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gypsybandito/~3/311193659/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gypsybandito/~3/311193659/"&gt;Plurk Sounds Like Poop&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this deal is perfectly fine. It would be as if any other site were to use AdSense to provides it's advertising. That is if it's truly Yahoo adding google ads to it's pages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, it does seem a bit fishy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Google were to provide search technology and begin running their searches in addition to providing advertising, then I think the public should be weary of a monopoly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But then again, I'm a GOOG shareholder, so I have a slanted opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Erik's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.erikvossman.com/2007/09/07/wanna-buy-some-blogs/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.erikvossman.com/2007/09/07/wanna-buy-some-blogs/"&gt;Wanna Buy Some Blogs?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erik</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:03:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, this trully unpredictable ending. Let's just see what happened next.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tiffany</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:41:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if Google will get the approval of the Dept. of Justice. Wish to see how this whole thing will work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andy, please keep informing us of this issue&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ashley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:19:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First Microsoft, then Google? It seems to me that Yahoo is jumping from pillar to post too rapidly.Perhaps they are in more trouble than we are led to believe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ken Nickless</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/google-to-doj-why-you-should-approve-yahoo-deal.html#comment-9429621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will the ads say -- "Ads By Google" ? Or "powered by Google?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder how are they actually going to integrate the whole thing. They said, they will choose the 'keywords' -- Question is based on what? It cant be random, can it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Saad Kamal</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:45:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>