<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Pilgrim - Latest Comments in Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet marketing news and views</description><atom:link href="https://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_buying_twitter_not_a_bad_idea/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:38:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439840</link><description>&lt;p&gt;when Twitter meets google I DO have a faith this what best google should take to keep his midas touch stay "update"remember Youtube after acquisition with google,this Video site has number 2 popular in same term of " searching video networks" ,though,with adding twitter I predict google can also add there "search term empire into "searching social networks' LIVE,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PerfectMoney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:38:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems that Google is really rich!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Darren Tan's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.indiesurf.com/late-of-the-pier/music-review-fantasy-black-channel-by-late-of-the-pier/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.indiesurf.com/late-of-the-pier/music-review-fantasy-black-channel-by-late-of-the-pier/"&gt;Music Review: ?Fantasy Black Channel? by Late Of The Pier&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darren Tan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:29:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tough to say whether or not this would be a good or bad thing overall, but I do think it makes a lot of sense. Twitter's obviously still on the rise and Google could really jumpstart its growth into the mainstream.  Which, again, may or may not be a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Josh's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FwdComedy/~3/0XI2HeOWlRM/recommended-reading-how-to-get-people.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FwdComedy/~3/0XI2HeOWlRM/recommended-reading-how-to-get-people.html"&gt;Recommended Reading: How To Get People To Link To Your Content&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:08:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm..Good Idea. Its a rocking news that Google is going to buy twitter. But according to me Twitter should stay alone. There is no need to do any partnership like things..alone you are rocking..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Server Services</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I pray Google does not buy Twitter. Twitter is the one true chance at breaking us from the stodgy static world Google represents. &lt;br&gt;I look at Google today as semi-relevant. Half the results at top spot are gamed or SEO'ed into that spot.&lt;br&gt;Not Google's fault mind you really.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I consider Twitter the truth engine. When you want an opinion just look for opinions and you get dozens in a minute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Google owned Twitter the SERPs gamers would break it down in no time, who would blame them for trying.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google/Yahoo/ MSFT/ IAC/ AOL/Facebook  please stay away from Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FireMan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure about the prospects of Twitter being bought, but imho a partnership deal with Google would be highly viable and mutually beneficial. It would provide Google with valuable data and inventory, and Twitter - with much needed revenue. And talking of data and metrics: hardly anyone can analyze (and turn into $$) the Twitter data better than Google, the world's largest BI company.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Maistora&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">V. DImitroff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:03:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never even heard of Jaiku before this post, which shows how productive it was in the USA.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:54:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439833</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The real answer is: Twitter should buy Google. The sad reality is that Google is too expensive for anyone to buy. But really, is creativity still on their side ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thierry de Baillon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:33:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft should buy Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Martín Aberastegue's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MartinAberastegue/~3/538782859/ayuda-a-tartagal.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MartinAberastegue/~3/538782859/ayuda-a-tartagal.html"&gt;Ayuda a Tartagal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martín Aberastegue</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy,&lt;br&gt;I do not see this as a good thing. &lt;br&gt;I do not feel we ANOTHER monopoly.&lt;br&gt;The Franchise King&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Franchise King</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:12:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439830</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy,&lt;br&gt;I do not see this as a good thing. &lt;br&gt;I do not feel we ANOTHER monopoly.&lt;br&gt;The Franchise King&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Joel Libava's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.thefranchiseking.com/2009/02/testimonial-john-b.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.thefranchiseking.com/2009/02/testimonial-john-b.html"&gt;Testimonial- John b&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Franchise King</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:12:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439829</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All the 3rd part apps seem to be making $ off Twitter. The decent paid iPhone apps have generated some cash and Twitteriffic offers a free ad-supported desk top app as well as a paid version.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for what Twitter could do as a business model...not sure unless they charge for API usage...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dan London's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.dan-london.com/2009/02/open-publishing/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dan-london.com/2009/02/open-publishing/"&gt;Create Your Own Book Deal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan London</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:59:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Buying Twitter? Not a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/google-buying-twitter-not-a-bad-idea.html#comment-9439828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh ya that would be a great buy for Google...$500 million minimum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Evan's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://experienceadvertising.com/why-twitter-is-the-coolest-thing-around/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://experienceadvertising.com/why-twitter-is-the-coolest-thing-around/"&gt;Why Twitter is the Coolest Thing Around?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan W.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:26:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>