<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Pilgrim - Latest Comments in Free Wall Street Journal.  Mostly.</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet marketing news and views</description><atom:link href="https://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/free_wall_street_journal_mostly/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:25:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Free Wall Street Journal.  Mostly.</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/free-wall-street-journal-mostly.html#comment-9423520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now you can read WSJ for free!! Try it out: &lt;a href="http://www.cs.grinnell.edu/~panjiabe/?page_id=21" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cs.grinnell.edu/~panjiabe/?page_id=21"&gt;http://www.cs.grinnell.edu/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony P</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:25:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Wall Street Journal.  Mostly.</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/free-wall-street-journal-mostly.html#comment-9423519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah I couldn't see them getting rid of their subscription model. I've read many articles about local newspapers losing big because everything their paper offers is free via the Internet. If they know they can't break even without it then getting rid of it would be quite silly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Expanding their free services is a great way to bump up impressions but they'll need to make sure their paying clients get the good stock information :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jayson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:48:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Wall Street Journal.  Mostly.</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/free-wall-street-journal-mostly.html#comment-9423518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was hoping they'd go more free, but I can't blame them for holding onto the subscription model. Jordan I think you're right that this decision came after Rupert Murdoch saw the numbers and realized how much more traffic he needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's still more free content for us so it's hard to complain.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Bradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:37:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Wall Street Journal.  Mostly.</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/free-wall-street-journal-mostly.html#comment-9423517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a good move by the WSJ.  The NY Times saw a huge jump in online traffic when they opened up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;GL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:11:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>