<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Pilgrim - Latest Comments in Could Cost Per Action Overtake Cost Per Click?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet marketing news and views</description><atom:link href="https://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/could_cost_per_action_overtake_cost_per_click/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:50:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Could Cost Per Action Overtake Cost Per Click?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/could-cost-per-action-to-overtake-cost-per-click.html#comment-9423516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with the cost per action model is that a publisher does not get paid even though it is contributing value to a particular brand. Although a person may not take action on a particular click, brand awareness is being created. This in itself is value to a company. Traditional media create only brand awareness and is compensated accordingly. I am not for monopolies but I do not see how a publisher can operate on a CPA basis only without being compensated even minimaly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">william</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:50:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Cost Per Action Overtake Cost Per Click?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/could-cost-per-action-to-overtake-cost-per-click.html#comment-9423514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read that article on Wed. with hope and optimism also thinking it might spur some more dialogue among the community.  It was a great article, and I agree with Aaron's points.  But one of the challenges, believe it or not, is that many marketers don't know the CPA value of their goal action (if the goal is a conversion).  That is one thing we at Adapt have been trying to educate our PPC management tool customers about (because one of the tool's optimization strategies is based on target cost-per-acquisition.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With that in mind, I liked particularly that Aaron  highlighted that the "A" could be any Action - from video view to newsletter signup to the most-commonly-used current definition of "sale."  If a broader definition is used (e.g. for many types of actions) then it might be easier for advertisers to truly follow that model &amp;amp; only pay for the actions they define.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erica Forrette</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Cost Per Action Overtake Cost Per Click?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/could-cost-per-action-to-overtake-cost-per-click.html#comment-9423513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That would be great if CPA took over, but not likely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan W.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:04:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Cost Per Action Overtake Cost Per Click?</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/could-cost-per-action-to-overtake-cost-per-click.html#comment-9423512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;only if people like Google want to lose money.&lt;br&gt;money dictates and while CPA may help the marketer the search engines [ Google] lose money and i don't think they will allow that.&lt;br&gt;yes i said allow - after all, google has every one by the ..... excuse me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bill s</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:20:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>