<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Pilgrim - Latest Comments in Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet marketing news and views</description><atom:link href="https://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/cingular_and_apple_dropped_the_seo_ball_with_iphone/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:51:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411069</link><description>&lt;p&gt;very interesting reflection - apple is what to think ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seoalligator</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:51:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;iPhone is available with Cingular ONLY!? And what if I am stuck under contract with a carrier OTHER than Cingular but still want a iPhone?&lt;br&gt;Well, the only solution I could fine was &lt;a href="http://www.Cellswapper.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.Cellswapper.com"&gt;http://www.Cellswapper.com&lt;/a&gt; - they get you out of any cell phone contract!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roger Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:24:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It might be that they didn't want to further invest in promoting the name until the trademark issue is settled.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">matkowsky.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:23:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Weel right now, Apple is on top with their &lt;a href="http://Apple.com/iphone" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Apple.com/iphone"&gt;Apple.com/iphone&lt;/a&gt; URL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is interesting that the carrier Cingular/Att is nowhere insight, perhaps Cingular/ATT cant really promote the iPhone until its approved by the FCC?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel R</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks like they missed out on at &lt;a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/11282" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/11282"&gt;10 million page views which went to Engadget&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kev</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:43:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two things:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. This is a special case, they didn't need help getting word out on the iPhone.  The media deluged us with information on it.  You had to be dead to not see news about it.  I am not saying they shouldn't have done, just that they didn't need to.  Now if you are a lesser known company with a lesser known product that is launching then yes Andy's comments are spot on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. There is still the "little" issue with the Cisco lawsuit.  It could be that the Cingular/Apple Legal teams wouldn't allow them to say anything pending an agreement - which they still don't have btw.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dean</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:42:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whether they dropped the ball for 24 hours of not Apple have a site ranking 2nd for iphone within 2 days of launch AND it has good content on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mad4</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411062</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's interesting to see that most blog posts I've seen about the iPhone link to articles or pictures from non Apple or Cingular websites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apple could definitely could have promoted their own webpages more heavily during the announcement to make sure they get a fairer share of the links. It'll be interesting to see how long it takes them to get the number one spot in Google.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kev</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know, you are absolutely correct. I did some digging and turns out this guy has free stats running on his site. Check out his page views over the past 2 days&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://my7.statcounter.com/project/standard/stats.php?account_id=394782&amp;amp;login_id=5&amp;amp;code=3a60c2f4fe17052c0b69d400ae65db7f&amp;amp;guest_login=1&amp;amp;project_id=1922682" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://my7.statcounter.com/project/standard/stats.php?account_id=394782&amp;amp;login_id=5&amp;amp;code=3a60c2f4fe17052c0b69d400ae65db7f&amp;amp;guest_login=1&amp;amp;project_id=1922682"&gt;http://my7.statcounter.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Luebke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:39:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411060</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeremy, I think they (the blogger) setup that page well in advance because of all the iPhone speculation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cameron Olthuis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:23:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cameron, somehow I missed your post before my last comment. I see what you mean for Apple. I have tried 3 different computers and 2 proxy servers and can't get your results but I'm sure they are propagating.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn't mean to suggest Apple launch the pages before the Jobs speech, just that it all be done and ready to go at the flip of a switch. I just find it funny that a random blogspot blog (at least in my results) beat Apple to the punch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Luebke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The official page is #1 on both G and Y at the moment. Other than that, ditto what Cameron said.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt McGee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:12:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Give it some time to update across the Google servers. Apple and Cingular both have to have grade pageranks. I would have expected better writing from this site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Schramm</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:47:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still nowhere on the top few pages for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Luebke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, apple now appears to have the #1 and #2 spots on Google.  AT least when I do the search.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Toivo Lainevool</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:09:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely an astute observation apart from all the rest of the iPhone noise in the blogosphere right now.  But my favorite part was:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;What happens if a product like the iPhone has major bugs and 3 of the top 5 listings in two months talk about how much the iPhone sucks? The potential revenue loss to such an event would be in the millions.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scare tactics at the highest levels.  Super enjoyable. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhilash</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:08:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeremy, I am not telling you they couldn't have done that because they did...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.apple.com/iphone/"&gt;http://www.apple.com/iphone/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cingular.com/iphone/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cingular.com/iphone/"&gt;http://www.cingular.com/iph...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Apple page has almost 5,000 links according to Yahoo Site Explorer and ranks #1(and #2) on Google for iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Give Google some time, you can't expect them to rank a page within minutes of it being live. In fact I'm surprised it's already up there after only about 27 hours or so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From what I got out of your post it sounds like you think they should've had these pages up prior to launch...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Both Cingular and Apple where in the perfect position to dominate the free market for the product."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"If Apple &amp;amp; Cingular had just taken the time to preemptively dominate the search engines"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You also have to take into consideration that the iPhone doesn't even go on sale for a good 6 months, pending FCC approval. I think you were a little quick to jump the gun on this one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will agree with one thing though, the Cingular page is not very well optimized.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cameron Olthuis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The #1 spot on Google for iPhone is &lt;a href="http://appleiphone.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://appleiphone.blogspot.com/"&gt;http://appleiphone.blogspot...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are telling me that neither Apple or Cingular could have simultaneously launched something on their websites about the iPhone as Jobs was making his speech? And then on the big screen Jobs showed and said check out &lt;a href="http://Apple.com/iPhone" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Apple.com/iPhone"&gt;Apple.com/iPhone&lt;/a&gt; for more info? That page would at this moment have thousands of links and be ranked #1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both Cingular and Apple have pages up promoting the thing but they missed the boat. There is zero reason why they aren't dominating search other than they did not plan ahead. If some blogger can rank #1, why can't they?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Luebke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:09:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jobs even said during his keynote that they could have let the FCC introduce the product but thought it best to do it themselves. The iPhone still needs FCC approval, and I doubt they want to start selling a product before it is a done deal. Also, if Cingular was to promote the phone heavily they would lose a lot of business until the phone comes out. And if the phone doesn't wind up getting approved they could lose customers indefinitely from the sour experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Schramm</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:30:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cingular and Apple Dropped the SEO Ball with iPhone</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/cingular-and-apple-dropped-the-seo-ball-with-iphone.html#comment-9411050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeremy, I think the reason you don't see any of what you mentioned is that Apple tries their damnedest to keep people from knowing about products before they announce them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If they had ranked organically for iPhone prior to yesterday we all would've known exactly what to expect from the keynote and there's no way they would've had the amount of hype/buzz they got yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cameron Olthuis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:49:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>