<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Pilgrim - Latest Comments in Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet marketing news and views</description><atom:link href="https://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/battle_royale_for_quotqueen_of_searchquot_title/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:50:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vanessa Fox RoxX!! :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sneezy Melon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:50:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My vote, undoubtedly , would be for Jennifer Slegg.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Apoorv Khatreja</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:49:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411550</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now Vanessa is the most searched!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yosax</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for clearing that up Shoe!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OK - so the rest of the "Gurus" forgot Mike Grehan ... I still say YEESH!  That man can spin circles around almost everybody on the list! :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shoe - you're excused since your a newbie ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Li Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:03:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Li-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I did not nominate anyone. I admitted that I was in no position to name (im a total newb to this seo world) the godfather of search so I emailed tons of people in the industry then posted there nominations in the poll.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Schoemaker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't need a poll to tell me who are the great women in internet marketing - I interview two of them every week. ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think these polls are just a little silly (in a good way) - but inevitably SOMEONE who each of us thinks should be on there, gets missed, write in or not.  I mean really now, Shoe left off Mike Grehan... yeesh!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Almost all the women on the list will say someone else is more deserving.  That's just how all these wonderful women are, they are all deserving... voting is just tough, and unfortunately right now, it looks kinda fruitless.  :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Li Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:36:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, after shoemoney's request i am sure who will win? :p you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mong</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, I'll hold you to that Andy!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kalena Jordan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:11:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Shoe told me he would buy me a beer if I voted for Jen.... well maybe not - but I think I can get him to buy me one anyway!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They are all royalty to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AussieWebmaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:20:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eric, if you are referring to me, you jumped to the wrong conclusion about my intent.  Shoemoney is a great guy and fun to hang out with. Jen has some serious supporters and is well loved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andy didn't put my name there for any reason other than to have some fun poking fun, which has been so totally fun, so far.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kim Krause Berg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:18:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eric, who are you talking to?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beal</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey hold on there â€“ It was form Jenâ€™s blog that I heard of Shoemoney a long time ago and then Shoe told me about this blog and the vote going on.  If you donâ€™t like the results donâ€™t watch the polls â€“ ask Danny Sullivan whoâ€™s the Queen if you want to know.  Itâ€™s funny guys take a poll on which guy is King and I did not see any cattiness â€“ just an observation.  To see someone who is on the voterâ€™s list post a sarcastic remark makes them look really sad â€“ no I mean really really sad.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Eric&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric D</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:49:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411540</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The intention wasn't linkbait, but I guess if it got Shoemoney to link here - and send his readers over to vote - then it must be pretty good linkbait. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beal</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:23:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, if before this looked like a "serious poll" ... now with Shoemoney promoting Jennifer Slegg this has become a "scientific poll". :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good linkbait though Andy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Igor M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:08:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So Jen's Prince comes and she gets the happily ever after ending.  Don't you love how fairy tales work? It's not what you know. It's who you know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kal, I'd be honored to keep scrubbing the floors with you :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kim Krause Berg (cre8pc)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:13:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411537</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, Shoemoney push me to vote Jennifer Slegg&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pogung177</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:01:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kalena, Kalena, Kalena. How is that I either miss your off a list or I miss Kim. I get an earache, either way. :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll make it up to you at the Search Summit Conference in Sydney. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beal</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:37:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Or someone voted more than once perhaps? Smells like Florida all over again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Temple</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:49:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I'm chopped liver once again? [sniff]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kalena Jordan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:01:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle Royale for &amp;quot;Queen of Search&amp;quot; Title</title><link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/battle-royale-for-queen-of-search-title.html#comment-9411533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How many tiers "search royalty" are there going to be?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">King</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:39:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>